Počet záznamov: 1
Why should we try to think like scientists? Scientific reasoningand susceptibility to epistemically suspect beliefs and cognitivebiases
Názov Why should we try to think like scientists? Scientific reasoningand susceptibility to epistemically suspect beliefs and cognitivebiases Autor Kurincová Čavojová Vladimíra 1978- SAVEXPSY - Ústav experimentálnej psychológie SAV ORCID Spoluautori Šrol Jakub 1992- SAVEXPSY - Ústav experimentálnej psychológie SAV ORCID Jurkovič Marek 1990- SAVEXPSY - Ústav experimentálnej psychológie SAV ORCID Zdroj.dok. Applied Cognitive Psychology. Vol. 34, no. 1 (2020), p. 85-95 Jazyk dok. eng - angličtina Krajina GB - Veľká Británia Druh dok. rozpis článkov z periodík (rbx) Ohlasy MASSOLO, Alba - TRAVERSI, Mariel. IS IT POSSIBLE TO MITIGATE COGNITIVE BIASES? A critical analysis of different proposals for reducing myside bias. In PROMETEICA-REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA Y CIENCIAS. ISSN 1852-9488, 2021, vol., no. 23, pp. 60-76. Dostupné na: https://doi.org/10.34024/prometeica.2021.23.11419. MARIN, Pinja - LINDEMAN, Marjaana. How do people perceive the relationship between science and religion? The roles of epistemic and ontological cognition. In APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY. ISSN 0888-4080, 2021, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1146-1157. Dostupné na: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3836. PIEJKA, Aleksandra - OKRUSZEK, Lukasz. Do you believe what you have been told? Morality and scientific literacy as predictors of pseudoscience susceptibility. In APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY. ISSN 0888-4080, 2020, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1072-1082. Dostupné na: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3687. ANASTASIADES E, ARGYRIDES M, MOUSOULIDOU M. Misinformation about COVID-19: Psychological Insights. Encyclopedia. 2021, 1, 1200–1214. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia1040091 GEORGIOU, Neophytos - DELFABBRO, Paul - BALZAN, Ryan. Conspiracy theory beliefs, scientific reasoning and the analytical thinking paradox. In APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY. ISSN 0888-4080, 2021, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1523-1534. Dostupné na: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3885. HA, Minsu - SYA'BANDARI, Yustika - RUSMANA, Ai Nurlaelasari - AINI, Rahmi Qurota - FADILLAH, Sarah Meilani. COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF THE FORT INSTRUMENT: USING DISTRACTOR ANALYSIS TO EXPLORE STUDENTS' SCIENTIFIC REASONING BASED ON ACADEMIC LEVEL AND GENDER DIFFERENCE. In JOURNAL OF BALTIC SCIENCE EDUCATION. ISSN 1648-3898, 2021, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 906-926. Dostupné na: https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.906. FILKUKOVA, Petra - LANGGUTH, Johannes. Blinded by Emotions: The Association between Emotional Reactivity and Trust in Fictitious News Stories on Crime. In STUDIA PSYCHOLOGICA. ISSN 0039-3320, 2021, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 404-416. Dostupné na: https://doi.org/10.31577/sp.2021.04.833. JUANCHICH, Marie - SIROTA, Miroslav - JOLLES, Daniel - WHILEY, Lilith A. Are COVID-19 conspiracies a threat to public health? Psychological characteristics and health protective behaviours of believers. In EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY. ISSN 0046-2772, 2022, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 969-989. Dostupné na: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2796. ERCEG, Nikola - GALIC, Zvonimir - BUBIC, Andreja. Normative responding on cognitive bias tasks: Some evidence for a weak rationality factor that is mostly explained by numeracy and actively open-minded thinking. In INTELLIGENCE. ISSN 0160-2896, 2022, Vol. 90, 2022, p. 101619. Dostupné na: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2021.101619. MORIN-CHASSÉ, Alexandre. Behavioral Genetics, Population Genetics, and Genetic Essentialism: A Survey Experiment. In Science and Education. ISSN 09267220, 2020-12-01, 29, 6, pp. 1595-1619. Dostupné na: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00166-y. MASNICK AM, MORRIS BJ. A Model of Scientific Data Reasoning. Education Sciences. 2022; 12(2):71. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020071 SALMA M, YILMAZ A. The relationship between the attitude towards socioscientific issues and views on COVID-19 and vaccine. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 2021, 8 (Special Issue), 83-98. https://dx.doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2021.8.4.667 SUNYÍK, Viktória - MAXOŇOVÁ, Ivana. Viera a využívanie doplnkovej a alternatívnej medicíny vo vzťahu s vedeckým myslením a dôverou k vede. In Social processes and personality 2022 / Sociálne procesy a osobnosť 2022 : Proceedings of the 23rd International Scientific Conference / Zborník príspevkov 23. ročníka medzinárodnej vedeckej konferencie. Magdalena Adamus, Jakub Šrol, Branislav Uhrecký. 1. vyd. - Bratislava : Ústav experimentálnej psychológie, Centrum spoločenských a psychologických vied, 2023, s. 442-449. ISBN 978-80-89524-86-0. BENSLEY, D. Alan. Critical Thinking, Intelligence, and Unsubstantiated Beliefs: An Integrative Review. In JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENCE, 2023, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. Dostupné na: https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11110207. BOWES, Shauna M. - COSTELLO, Thomas H. - TASIMI, Arber. The Conspiratorial Mind: A Meta-Analytic Review of Motivational and Personological Correlates. In PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2023, vol. 149, no. 5-6, pp. 259-293. ISSN 0033-2909. Dostupné na: https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000392. ALBARRACIN, D - ALBARRACIN, J - CHAN, MS - JAMIESON, KH. Creating Conspiracy Beliefs. In CREATING CONSPIRACY BELIEFS, 2022, vol., no., pp. 1-308. Dostupné na: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108990936. HARTMANN, Matthias - MUELLER, Petra. Acceptance and Adherence to COVID-19 Preventive Measures are Shaped Predominantly by Conspiracy Beliefs, Mistrust in Science and Fear A Comparison of More than 20 Psychological Variables. In PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2023, vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 1742-1783. ISSN 0033-2941. Dostupné na: https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211073656. ALPER, Sinan. There are higher levels of conspiracy beliefs in more corrupt countries. In EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 503-517. ISSN 0046-2772. Dostupné na: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2919. GEORGIOU, Neophytos - DELFABBRO, Paul - BALZAN, Ryan. The effectiveness of a scientific reasoning intervention for conspiracy theory beliefs. In APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 369-382. ISSN 0888-4080. Dostupné na: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.4039. ASHINOFF, Brandon K. - BUCK, Justin - WOODFORD, Michael - HORGA, Guillermo. The effects of base rate neglect on sequential belief updating and real-world beliefs. In PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2022, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. ISSN 1553-734X. Dostupné na: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010796. MIKUSKOVA, Eva Ballova. Education and conspiracy beliefs: A replication of van Prooijen (2017). In APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 174-188. ISSN 0888-4080. Dostupné na: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.4037. LIN, Chien-An - BATES, Timothy C. Smart people know how the economy works: Cognitive ability, economic knowledge and financial literacy. In INTELLIGENCE, 2022, vol. 93, no., pp. ISSN 0160-2896. Dostupné na: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2022.101667. LINDEMAN, Marjaana - SVEDHOLM-HAKKINEN, Annika M. - RIEKKI, Tapani J. J. Searching for the cognitive basis of anti-vaccination attitudes. In THINKING & REASONING, 2023, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 111-136. ISSN 1354-6783. Dostupné na: https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2022.2046158. YELBUZ, Busra Elif - MADAN, Ecesu - ALPER, Sinan. Reflective thinking predicts lower conspiracy beliefs: A meta-analysis. In JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2022, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 720-744. ISSN 1930-2975. CADDICK, Zachary A. - FEIST, Gregory J. When beliefs and evidence collide: psychological and ideological predictors of motivated reasoning about climate change. In THINKING & REASONING, 2022, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 428-464. ISSN 1354-6783. Dostupné na: https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2021.1994009. GEORGIOU, Neophytos - DELFABBRO, Paul - BALZAN, Ryan. Latent profile analysis of schizotypy, autistic traits and conspiracy theory beliefs: Associations with cognitive flexibility and scientific reasoning performance. In JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 2022, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. Dostupné na: https://doi.org/10.1177/20438087221125046. SUNYÍK, Viktória. Enhancing scientific reasoning and trust in science: the impact of a methodology course on unfounded beliefs – a pilot study. In Cognition and Artificial Life 2024. Editori: Čeněk Šašinka, Zdeněk Stachoň, Stanislav Popelka, Michal Černý, Nicol Dostálová, David Košatka, Alžběta Šašinková. - Olomouc, ČR : Univerzita Palackého Olomouc, 2024, s. 96-100. ISBN 978-80-88123-36-1. Dostupné na internete: <https://webcentrum.muni.cz/media/3657944/proceedings_cal-2024_2.pdf> Kategória ADCA - Vedecké práce v zahraničných karentovaných časopisoch impaktovaných Kategória (od 2022) V3 - Vedecký výstup publikačnej činnosti z časopisu Typ výstupu článok Rok vykazovania 2020 Registrované v WOS Registrované v SCOPUS Registrované v CCC DOI 10.1002/acp.3595 
článok
Názov súboru Prístup Veľkosť Stiahnuté Typ Licence Why should we try to think like scientists Scientific reasoning and susceptibility to epistemically suspect beliefs and cognitive biases.pdf Prístupný z IP adries SAV 240.4 KB 1 Postprint rok CC IF IF Q (best) JCR Av Jour IF Perc SJR SJR Q (best) CiteScore A rok vydania rok metriky IF IF Q (best) SJR SJR Q (best) 2020 2019 1.591 Q3 0.824 Q1
Počet záznamov: 1