Basket | Univerzitná knižnica Univerzity Mateja Bela

1.Epistemic and ethical responsibility during the pandemic

SYS		0304977
LBL		-----naa--22--------450-
005		20240502141133.8
014		$a 2-s2.0-85122851311 $2 SCOPUS
017	70	$a 10.2478/ebce-2021-0017 $2 DOI
035		$a biblio/446296 $2 CREPC2
100		$a 20220111d2021 m y slo 03 ba
101	0-	$a eng
102		$a PL
200	1-	$a Epistemic and ethical responsibility during the pandemic $f Andrea Klimková
330		$a Intellectual (specialised) knowledge is omnipresent in human lives and decisions. We are constantly trying to make good and correct decisions. However, responsible decision-making is characterised by rather difficult epistemic conditions. It applies all the more during the pandemic when decisions require not only specialised knowledge in a number of disciplines, scientific consensus, and participants from different fields, but also responsibility and respect for moral principles in order to ensure that the human rights of all groups are observed. Pandemic measures are created by politicians, healthcare policy-makers, and epidemiologists. However, what is the role of ethics as a moral philosophy and experts in ethics? Experts in ethics and philosophy are carefully scrutinising political decisions. Levy and Savulescu (2020) have claimed that Ethicists and philosophers are not epistemically arrogant if they question policy responses. They played an important role in the creation of a reliable consensus. This study analyses epistemic and moral responsibility, their similarities, analogies, and differences. Are they interconnected? What is their relationship and how can they be filled with actual content during the pandemic?
463	-1	$1 001 umb_un_cat0305066 $1 011* $a 2453-7829 $1 200 1 $a Ethics & Bioethics $e (in Central Europe) $v Vol. 11, no. 3-4 (2021), pp. 117-125 $1 210 $a Warsaw $c De Gruyter Poland $d 2021
606	0-	$3 umb_un_auth*0291089 $a epistemická zodpovednosť $X epistemic responsibility
606	0-	$3 umb_un_auth*0122263 $a morálna zodpovednosť $X moral responsibility
606	0-	$3 umb_un_auth*0262914 $a epistemické komunity
606	0-	$3 umb_un_auth*0281914 $a pandémie $X pandemy
608		$3 umb_un_auth*0273282 $a články $X journal articles
700	-1	$3 umb_un_auth*0154160 $a Klimková $b Andrea $p UMBFF10 $4 070 $9 100 $f 1967- $T Katedra filozofie
801		$a SK $b BB301 $g AACR2 $9 unimarc sk
856		$u https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/ebce-2021-0017 $a Link na plný text
T85		$x existuji fulltexy

2.Nodl, Martin

SYS		0115364
LBL		00542nx^^^22001813^^45
005		20060914095137.3
100		$a 20060914asloy0103 ba
152		$a AACR2
200	-1	$a Nodl $b Martin
801	-0	$a SK $b BB301

3.Pišút, Ján

SYS		0003976
LBL		00542nx^^^22001813^^45
005		20040921100056.4
100		$a 20040921asloy0103 ba
152		$a AACR2
200	-0	$a Pišút $b Ján
801		$a SK $b BB301 $c 20040921

4.Raganová, Janka, 1963-

SYS		0000026
LBL		00575nx^^^22002173^^450
005		20250331111633.5
035		$a person/80764 $2 CREPC2
035		$a https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3310-3319 $2 ORCID
100		$a 20040825asloy0103 ba
120		$a a
152		$a AACR2
200	-1	$a Raganová $b Janka $f 1963-
801	-0	$a SK $b BB301

5.svalový systém

SYS		0090327
LBL		00542nx^^^22001813^^45
005		20170814110752.6
100		$a 20050511asloy0103 ba
152		$a AACR2
250	-1	$a svalový systém
450		$7 ba $5 z
801		$a SK $b BB301 $c 20050511
980		$x K

6.event-by-event fluctuations

SYS		0141880
LBL		00542nx^^^22001813^^45
005		20170814111106.5
250		$a event-by-event fluctuations
450		$7 ba $5 z

7.International Symposium on Fuzzy Sets. medzinárodné sympózium

SYS		0298008
LBL		00542nx^^^22001813^^45
005		20230524093200.0
100		$a 20230524asloy0103 ba
152		$a AACR2
210	11	$a International Symposium on Fuzzy Sets $b medzinárodné sympózium $e Rzeszów $f 19.-21.05.2023
801	-0	$a SK $b BB301 $c 2003