Basket

  Untick selected:   0
  1. SYS0318050
    LBL
      
    -----naa--22--------450-
    005
      
    20240216073614.4
    014
      
    $a 001032328700004 $2 WOS CC. ESCI
    017
    70
    $a 10.9770/jesi.2023.10.3(6) $2 DOI
    035
      
    $a biblio/1037893 $2 CREPC2
    100
      
    $a 20230328d2023 m y slo 03 ba
    101
    0-
    $a eng
    102
      
    $a LT
    200
    1-
    $a Security and defence are truly a priority for the member states of the European Union: fact of hoax? $f Radoslav Ivančík, Pavel Nečas
    330
      
    $a All the often-contradictory hoaxes concerning the European Union (EU) are so-called Euro-myths. They mostly have a negative tone and try to denigrate this institution. Their emergence is caused by the fact that individual states often need more information about what is happening in the EU, and the complex mechanism of the Union's functioning is difficult to understand. Therefore, when the next "EU wants to ban something" comes out, ordinary people tend to take it as a given without verifying the information, ensuring the defence of freedom, independence, sovereignty, territorial integrity, and population belongs to the main objective of each state. Thus, in response to the current political, security and economic situation, countries must earmark, within the framework of their national budgets, a proportion of the available resources to ensure their defence. The aim of this paper, based on current trends in the defence budgets of the EU member states, is to point out, that not only the global economic and financial crisis and the credit and debt crisis in the Euro-area have a significant negative impact on the amount of resources, which individual EU member states earmark to ensure their defence, but, in addition, all these aspects should be precisely understood, bearing in mind, the growing influence of disinformation spread, leveraged by the hoax rising influence.
    463
    -1
    $1 001 umb_un_cat*0318065 $1 011 $a 2345-0282 $1 200 1 $a Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues $v Vol. 10, no. 3 (2023), pp. 73-83 $1 210 $a Vilnus $c Entrepreneurship and sustainability center $d 2023
    606
    0-
    $3 umb_un_auth*0053893 $a štátna bezpečnosť
    606
    0-
    $3 umb_un_auth*0277919 $a dezinformácie $X disinformation
    606
    0-
    $3 umb_un_auth*0286255 $a hoaxy $X hoaxes
    606
    0-
    $3 umb_un_auth*0111643 $a štáty Európskej únie
    608
      
    $3 umb_un_auth*0273282 $a články $X journal articles
    700
    -1
    $3 umb_un_auth*0208995 $a Ivančík $b Radoslav $4 070 $9 80
    701
    -1
    $3 umb_un_auth*0162300 $a Nečas $b Pavel $f 1960- $p UMBPO08 $9 20 $4 070 $T Katedra bezpečnostných štúdií
    801
      
    $a SK $b BB301 $g AACR2 $9 unimarc sk
    856
      
    $u https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/1054 $a Link na plný text
    T85
      
    $x existuji fulltexy
  2. SYS0270939
    LBL
      
    00542nx^^^22001813^^45
    005
      
    20181105113900.3
    250
      
    $a relativistická metóda spriahnutých klastrov
    450
      
    $5 z $7 ba
  3. SYS0282994
    LBL
      
    00542nx^^^22001813^^45
    005
      
    20200923123515.5
    100
      
    $a 20200922asloy0103 ba
    152
      
    $a AACR2
    210
    02
    $a Vyšehradská štvorka
    410
    02
    $a Višegrádska štvorka $8 slo $5 z
    410
    02
    $a V4 (zoskupenie štátov) $8 slo $5 z
    410
    02
    $a Vyšehradská skupina $8 $z z
    410
    02
    $a Visegrad Group $8 eng $5 z
    801
    -0
    $a SK $b BB301

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.