- Epistemic and ethical responsibility during the pandemic
Number of the records: 1  

Epistemic and ethical responsibility during the pandemic

  1. SYS0304977
    LBL
      
    -----naa--22--------450-
    005
      
    20240502141133.8
    014
      
    $a 2-s2.0-85122851311 $2 SCOPUS
    017
    70
    $a 10.2478/ebce-2021-0017 $2 DOI
    035
      
    $a biblio/446296 $2 CREPC2
    100
      
    $a 20220111d2021 m y slo 03 ba
    101
    0-
    $a eng
    102
      
    $a PL
    200
    1-
    $a Epistemic and ethical responsibility during the pandemic $f Andrea Klimková
    330
      
    $a Intellectual (specialised) knowledge is omnipresent in human lives and decisions. We are constantly trying to make good and correct decisions. However, responsible decision-making is characterised by rather difficult epistemic conditions. It applies all the more during the pandemic when decisions require not only specialised knowledge in a number of disciplines, scientific consensus, and participants from different fields, but also responsibility and respect for moral principles in order to ensure that the human rights of all groups are observed. Pandemic measures are created by politicians, healthcare policy-makers, and epidemiologists. However, what is the role of ethics as a moral philosophy and experts in ethics? Experts in ethics and philosophy are carefully scrutinising political decisions. Levy and Savulescu (2020) have claimed that Ethicists and philosophers are not epistemically arrogant if they question policy responses. They played an important role in the creation of a reliable consensus. This study analyses epistemic and moral responsibility, their similarities, analogies, and differences. Are they interconnected? What is their relationship and how can they be filled with actual content during the pandemic?
    463
    -1
    $1 001 umb_un_cat*0305066 $1 011 $a 2453-7829 $1 200 1 $a Ethics & Bioethics $e (in Central Europe) $v Vol. 11, no. 3-4 (2021), pp. 117-125 $1 210 $a Warsaw $c De Gruyter Poland $d 2021
    606
    0-
    $3 umb_un_auth*0291089 $a epistemická zodpovednosť $X epistemic responsibility
    606
    0-
    $3 umb_un_auth*0122263 $a morálna zodpovednosť $X moral responsibility
    606
    0-
    $3 umb_un_auth*0262914 $a epistemické komunity
    606
    0-
    $3 umb_un_auth*0281914 $a pandémie $X pandemy
    608
      
    $3 umb_un_auth*0273282 $a články $X journal articles
    700
    -1
    $3 umb_un_auth*0154160 $a Klimková $b Andrea $p UMBFF10 $4 070 $9 100 $f 1967- $T Katedra filozofie
    801
      
    $a SK $b BB301 $g AACR2 $9 unimarc sk
    856
      
    $u https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/ebce-2021-0017 $a Link na plný text
    T85
      
    $x existuji fulltexy
Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.