Výsledky vyhľadávania
Názov Epistemická disfigurácia reprezentatívneho modelu demokracie v krízovej situácii Súbež.n. Epistemic disfiguration of the representative democracy model in a crisis situation Aut.údaje Simona Kováčová Autor Kováčová Simona 1987- (100%) UMBPO01 - Katedra politológie
Zdroj.dok. Interpolis '22 : recenzovaný zborník vedeckých prác z medzinárodnej vedeckej konferencie Interpolis '22. S. 55-67. - Banská Bystrica : Vydavateľstvo Univerzity Mateja Bela - Belianum, 2022 / Kováčová Eleonóra 1977- ; Šimková Patrícia 1996- ; Žipaj Tomáš 1996- ; Nečas Pavel 1960- ; Kováčová Natália 1987- ; Kucharčík Rudolf ; Rýsová Lucia 1977- ; Interpolis '22 medzinárodná vedecká konferencia Kľúč.slová politické rozhodovanie - political decision making - decision making in politics epistemická zodpovednosť - epistemic responsibility covid-19 - koronavírus - Covid-19 (disease) - SARS-CoV-2 disease - Coronavirus disease 2019 Form.deskr. príspevky v zborníku - proceedings papers Jazyk dok. slovenčina Krajina Slovenská republika URL Link na plný text Kategória publikačnej činnosti AFD Číslo archívnej kópie 52708 Katal.org. BB301 - Univerzitná knižnica Univerzity Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici Báza dát xpca - PUBLIKAČNÁ ČINNOSŤ Title Epistemic and ethical responsibility during the pandemic Author info Andrea Klimková Author Klimková Andrea 1967- (100%) UMBFF10 - Katedra filozofie
Source document Ethics & Bioethics : (in Central Europe). Vol. 11, no. 3-4 (2021), pp. 117-125. - Warsaw : De Gruyter Poland, 2021 Keywords epistemická zodpovednosť - epistemic responsibility morálna zodpovednosť epistemické komunity - epistemic communities pandémie - pandémia - pandemy Form. Descr. články - journal articles Language English Country Poland Annotation Intellectual (specialised) knowledge is omnipresent in human lives and decisions. We are constantly trying to make good and correct decisions. However, responsible decision-making is characterised by rather difficult epistemic conditions. It applies all the more during the pandemic when decisions require not only specialised knowledge in a number of disciplines, scientific consensus, and participants from different fields, but also responsibility and respect for moral principles in order to ensure that the human rights of all groups are observed. Pandemic measures are created by politicians, healthcare policy-makers, and epidemiologists. However, what is the role of ethics as a moral philosophy and experts in ethics? Experts in ethics and philosophy are carefully scrutinising political decisions. Levy and Savulescu (2020) have claimed that Ethicists and philosophers are not epistemically arrogant if they question policy responses. They played an important role in the creation of a reliable consensus. This study analyses epistemic and moral responsibility, their similarities, analogies, and differences. Are they interconnected? What is their relationship and how can they be filled with actual content during the pandemic? URL Link na plný text Public work category ADM No. of Archival Copy 51065 Repercussion category DA SILVA NETO, Priscila Kelly - DE SOUZA, Marcela Tavares - DE GOUVEA, Aline Russomano - DA MATA, Luciana Regina Ferreira - LUCHESI, Bruna Moretti - PESSALACIA, Juliana Dias Reis. Health professionals' knowledge about ethical criteria in the allocation of resources in the COVID-19 pandemic. In Monash bioethics review. ISSN 1321-2753, 2023, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 181-197.
ROMERA, Andrea. No room for patients or ethics : Covid-19-broken hospitals in Madrid. In Ethics and bioethics. ISSN 1338-5615, 2022, vol. 12, no. 1-2, pp. 79-83.
Catal.org. BB301 - Univerzitná knižnica Univerzity Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici Database xpca - PUBLIKAČNÁ ČINNOSŤ References PERIODIKÁ-Súborný záznam periodika